Who writes the narrative
Ask for the technical background of the person drafting. Ours are engineers and scientists who interview your technical leads directly, rather than finance staff working from a cost schedule.
R&D Tax Credit Specialists
The word is used loosely. These are the things worth checking before you appoint anyone, including us.
Ask for the technical background of the person drafting. Ours are engineers and scientists who interview your technical leads directly, rather than finance staff working from a cost schedule.
A fixed fee agreed before we start, quoted against size and complexity. No percentage of your credit, so nobody is paid more for a bigger number than the evidence supports.
HMRC compliance activity on R&D claims has risen sharply. If a claim we prepared is enquired into, we handle the correspondence. Our reports are written on the assumption they will be read closely.
We write grant applications as well as claims, so grant funded projects are structured with the tax position in mind from the start rather than reconciled afterwards.
Across the projects we take on after screening, more than 90% of engagements end in funding or relief secured, and more than 80% of individual applications we write succeed. Both figures cover work we accepted, not every enquiry we receive.
We interview the people who did the work and separate genuine advances from routine development, so the claim is built on defensible projects rather than a spreadsheet of costs.
Staff time, externally provided workers, subcontractors, software, cloud and consumables, apportioned with a method we can stand behind if HMRC asks.
Written in the language of the guidelines: baseline, uncertainty, advance and the competent professional. Plus the additional information form HMRC now requires.
If HMRC opens an enquiry into a claim we prepared, we handle the correspondence. Our reports are written on the assumption they will be read closely.
Entitlement calculator
Enter the costs behind your technical work for one accounting period. We apply the current UK rules, including the 65% restriction on unconnected subcontractors, and show the working.
Gross salary, employer NI and pension for the time spent solving the technical uncertainty.
UK-based subcontractors only. Usually claimable at 65% of the invoice for unconnected parties, which we apply for you.
Licences, compute and datasets used directly in the R&D, apportioned to the project.
Materials, reagents, prototypes and a fair share of light, heat and power.
Payments to trial participants and other categories HMRC allows.
Does the work qualify? Five questions HMRC will ask.
Most UK companies, whatever their size.
20% above-the-line credit, worth roughly 15.0% to 16.2% of qualifying spend after tax.
Loss-making SMEs where qualifying R&D is at least 30% of total expenditure.
An 86% enhancement plus a 14.5% payable credit, worth up to around 27.0% of qualifying spend in cash.
Rates and thresholds are set by HMRC and can change at a Budget. We confirm the rules that apply to your accounting period before we quote.
A 20-minute call to test whether the work qualifies, which scheme applies and roughly what the claim is worth. If it is not worth claiming, we say so.
Two to three short sessions with your technical leads. We do the writing, you correct the science.
We work with your finance lead or accountant to pull the qualifying costs and agree apportionment before anything is drafted.
You approve the technical narrative and cost schedule, then we file alongside your CT600 with your accountant and track the claim through to payment.
Founder time is roughly four to six hours in total, nearly all of it in the technical interviews.
Non-dilutive funding works best as a stack. A grant pays for the project up front, relief returns cash on the spend afterwards.
A fixed fee agreed before we start, quoted against the size and complexity of the claim. No percentage of your credit, no equity and no lock-in on future years. You keep the technical report either way.
We will review last year's report free of charge and tell you plainly whether it would survive an enquiry and whether qualifying costs were missed.
We defend claims through an HMRC compliance check, including claims written by other advisers. How enquiry defence works.
An accountant assembles the numbers. A specialist establishes whether the work qualifies and writes the technical case HMRC actually assesses: the baseline in the field, the uncertainty, the advance sought and the competent professional behind it. We interview your engineers and scientists directly, which is why our claims read as technical documents rather than cost schedules.
A fixed fee agreed before we start, quoted against the size and complexity of the claim. No percentage of the credit, no equity and no lock in on future years, so nobody here is paid more for a bigger number than the evidence supports. You keep the technical report either way.
If HMRC enquires into a claim we prepared, we handle the correspondence at no extra cost. We also defend claims prepared by other advisers on a fixed fee, including reviewing whether the original position is worth defending.
Yes. We review last year's report free of charge and tell you plainly whether it would survive an enquiry and whether qualifying costs were missed. A pre submission review is the cheapest form of enquiry defence there is.
Constantly. We write grant applications as well as claims, so grant funded projects are structured with the tax position in mind from the start rather than reconciled afterwards. Under the merged scheme grant funding does not restrict the claim.
Roughly four to six hours in total, nearly all of it in the technical interviews. We do the writing and you correct the science.
Three recent R&D tax claims, anonymised at the clients' request. Sector, scheme and recovered amounts are real.

£96,000
CleanTech hardware company (name withheld)
Clean tech: advanced hardware
Read the case study
£218,000
MedTech company (name withheld)
Life sciences: medical devices
Read the case study
£142,000
B2B AI software company (name withheld)
AI / software: enterprise machine learning
Read the case studyBook a free 20-minute review. We will tell you which scheme applies, roughly what the claim is worth and whether it is worth doing at all.